In response to the review by Mr. St Louis,
When a contractor is retained to provide services, the terms and payment schedule is essential A client must trust the contractor to deliver on the vision of their project, and a contractor must trust that they will be paid in exchange.
It was not my goal was not to embarrass myself by asking for payment the Friday night when I sought to collect the first overdue amount for the pool kit which was delivered days prior. It was prompted after the previous day I was told, “I promise to be your worst customer ever” and this was before the pool was installed. We probably should have gone our separate ways at this point.
We take a progress payment when the pool kit is delivered to the client’s home. No threats were uttered by me, I simply explained that I could not move forward constructing the pool if the account was to remain delinquent. At the time the kit is delivered we accept a cheque for the delivery of the pool kit which is custom ordered for each project according to selections which are unique to each project.
Prior to the liner being installed, we insisted on collecting the overdue payment from the additional services provided 2 months prior (which I had compromised and discounted already). This payment was received in the form of a cheque on that day which one of my staff had brought back to the office, and my accountant subsequently took to the bank teller to have it certified. Unfortunately, the project came to a stop again when the teller notified us that the funds were not certifiable. We DO accept cheques, (so long as they are able to clear) MasterCard, Visa and cash.
With the heat of the day, the water trucks waiting on site, and the drama that ensued stopping work on the site, a decision was made late in the day to fill the pool with water (as noted by your review under the looming threat that if the water was not to go in we would be stuck with the bill for the water which arrived many hours too early). The decision made to fill the pool with water in light of the circumstances was not a good decision. There were more wrinkles than is acceptable and indeed cost the company more in the long run.
When I visited the site myself to measure the pool to determine the cause and see first hand the wrinkles, I immediately offered to order and reinstall a new liner at my expense. An option was provided to have it replaced as soon as a new liner could be fabricated or late in the fall at closing time so that it would not disrupt the swimming season for our client. We delivered on this as noted. The lights are to be reinstalled in the spring as per usual when the pool is opened for the season.
I do not believe that the first liner should reflect on my staff’s qualifications, but a result of the circumstances that day. We installed well over 60 this season with great success and they have done hundreds over the years in the pool industry. We have a tremendous group of the most highly trained professionals in the industry. I am thankful to see that the review albeit negative primarily towards my leadership as an owner, recognizes the strengths of some of them including Corey.
We are not leveraged by hold backs or money to correct our mistakes. When a mistakes are made such as in the liner install, we are a group that has enough pride to comeback and fix the problem. This is case in point as there was nothing to gain monetarily by doing what was right in this circumstance.
As someone who has been in business for over 13 years, I take a tremendous pride in the work that our company does and in the people we employ.
As I said at the outset, the relationship between contractor and client needs to start with trust and it is the first and hopefully only time a project begins with a client making a vow to “be the worst customer ever” (your words not mine).